Monthly Analysis:
June 2004

By: Ryan Mauro

tdcanalyst@optonline.net

 

War on Terrorism

            In response to the failure to find WMDs, the findings of the 9-11 commission and political pressure, CIA director George Tenet has agreed to step down in mid-July. Not much can be said about this. All we can do is wait and hope that the new director has the guts to reform the CIA, and hopefully, get rid of various institutional biases and agendas that undermine our intelligence gathering efforts.

            The United States government in June 2004 authorized a reduction of the American nuclear arsenal in half over the next 8 years. Over 4,600 hydrogen bombs and warheads will be destroyed, leaving us with an arsenal of 6,000 weapons, bringing us back to the level of the late 1950s. W80 cruise missile warheads will be reduced by 1,000; the number of W76 Trident SLBM warheads will be reduced by 1,500; and B61 strategic bombs will be reduced by 600. However, on the other hand, all but two types of warheads planned for retirement will stay, and Sandia nuclear labs are to begin new rounds of studying of how to enhance the capabilities of the smaller arsenal including how to expand explosive yields. [1]

            WorldThreats.com cannot condemn the reduction of a massive nuclear arsenal. But we can condemn the weak line taken towards China and apparent failure to comprehend their plans to modernize and expand their nuclear arsenal. In addition we also criticize the failure of the West to see how Russia is not fully disarming its nukes, probably has hidden stores, and continues to produce more and more advanced nuclear weapons meant to defeat potential anti-ballistic missile systems. We hope the additional resources gained from the nuclear reductions will be used efficiently.

            On the terrorism front, there is increased worry of attacks during the Democratic or Republican national conventions or the elections. It appears that terrorists are eager to strike this summer, particularly in Iraq and Saudi Arabia. Two Islamic terror websites posted threats to Western airlines from the Saudi branch of Al-Qaeda on June 7. They confirmed that the targeting of modes of transportation were their focus. [2] Also this month, three Al-Qaeda operatives tried to break into a military hospital disguised as women to rescue the head of the terrorist squad that attacked the Khobar installations a few months earlier. [3]

            Saudi opposition figures at the Saudi Institute in Washington DC claims that senior elements of the Saudi security apparatus knew the location of Al-Qaeda chief Abdul Aziz Al-Muqrin at least three days before he killed an American hostage. [4] In addition, Al-Qaeda publications and tapes indicate that elements of Saudi security are helping them carry out attacks.

            WorldThreats.com’s work with the Northeast Intelligence Network (HomelandSecurityUS.com) has shown an increased effort by terrorists to:

            A: Conduct shootings, ambushes, assassinations and kidnappings in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf

            B: Plan for major attacks on government and international installations in Iraq on or soon after the June 30th handover of power. There are signs they are going to try to decapitate the new Iraqi government. Intelligence of this nature was received before, but in greater amounts after the tape Zarqawi made vowing to kill the Iraqi Prime Minister Iyad Allawi. [5]

            C: Inside the US, an increased focus on using plots involving trains. These plots involving trains differ as some call for derailing the train, others call for exploding bombs. Most of these plots involve other elements such as chemical weapons or simultaneous truck bombings.

 

            Al-Qaeda is also working to develop a naval-strike capability by purchasing small vessels for use as suicide boats. Al-Qaeda has published a naval manual calling for the targeting of natural gas installations or ports with oil and/or gas terminals. The Al-Qaeda Gulf operational commander has confirmed plans to conduct an aerial attack against a supertanker. [6]

            An Italian prosecutor heightened the worry by telling the press that he gave American authorities the transcripts of phone calls between suspected terrorists including one where they refer to a woman ready for an apparent chemical strike inside America. [7] Another interesting development was that Afghan rebel leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar told a Pakistani paper that Osama Bin Laden was in Kandahar, Afghanistan, and that Mullah Omar’s illness has forced Jalaluddin Haqqani, the Taliban’s intelligence chief, to become the new leader of the Taliban. [8]

            On the human rights front, ten nations were threatened with sanctions by the US for making inadequate efforts to stop human trafficking according to the State Department. The countries were: Bangladesh, Burma/Myanmar, Cuba, Ecuador, Equatorial Guinea, Guyana, North Korea, Sierra Leone, Sudan and Venezuela. [9]

           

Middle East

            Despite worry of a civil war inside Iraq, WorldThreats.com does not believe this is likely. An opinion piece in ABC News’ online reports on May 30, 2004, reflected why we believe this. Among the facts given in the piece were that the Sunnis and Shiites have not been violent for many years, and intermarriage was very common especially in Baghdad. The religious sects have united in the face of terrorism, rather than fighting as far as any analyst can tell. In March 2004, radical Sunnis attacked holy Shiite shrines in Baghdad and Karbala. If there was ever an opportunity for civil war to break out amidst instability, it was then. Instead, we saw thousands of pints of blood given from the Sunni areas, particularly the strongholds of Ramadi and Fallujah.

            The radical Shiites failed to instigate a Shiite uprising even with the help of international terrorist forces and Iran. It should also be mentioned (this was not in the piece) that during the Iran-Iraq War, we actually saw Iraqi Shiites fight Iranian Shiites. There was no uprising inside Iraq. Thus, WorldThreats.com concludes that there will not be a civil war as it does not benefit either side, and factors such as nationalism, religious tolerance and a longing for freedom will overcome such temptations.

            There was a dramatic development in Iraq missed by the major media, and it dramatically decreases the chances of a civil war in Iraq. Nine Iraqi militias agreed to disband, and contribute troops to security. Only the Fallujah Brigade (the terrorists and ex-Republican Guard forces) and the Mehdi Army of Moqatada al-Sadr did not agree to disband. The groups agreeing to disband were: Iraqi National Accord, Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, Kurdish Democratic Party, Badr Brigade, Iraqi Hezbollah, Iraqi Communist Party, Iraqi Islamic Party, Dawa Party and Iraqi National Congress. [10]

            This is dramatic as these forces are already trained and equipped. Their presence in the security forces will provide leadership, experience, and will fuse their specific ideology and desires into the security forces as part of the movement to create a stable, democratic Iraq, rather than pursue these desires separately. This will show the Iraqi forces that they’re individual beliefs are taken into consideration and are not at odds with the goal of a democratic Iraq. This will boost nationalism, loyalty, and morale. Additionally, it provides us with the security forces we need and enhances intelligence many times over. They know the terrain, culture and language better than anyone.

            The UN has confirmed finding evidence that Iraq had banned WMD programs. Missile engines for long-range Iraqi ballistic missiles were found in Rotterdam junk yards holding iron scrap. [11] The UN concluded that WMD components and medium-range ballistic missiles were shipped outside of Iraq before, during and after the war. UNMOVIC briefed the Security Council on the new findings, showing satellite photos that demonstrated that suspected missile and WMD sites were dismantled. The facilities and weapons were sent out to places in Europe and the Middle East at a rate of 1,000 tons of metal per month. Destroyed missiles and their components were sent to Jordan, Turkey and the Netherlands. Some of these dismantled missiles have been found with UN inspection tags on them. [12]

            Iraq Survey Group head Charles Duelfer came out and told the press that he finds evidence of illegal WMD activity “almost every day”, and that the ISG has confirmed the finding of up to a dozen chemical shells armed with sarin and mustard gas. He also warned that terrorist groups were trying to recruit Iraq’s WMD experts. [13]

Ahmad Chalabi, accused of deliberately giving false intelligence (possibly on Iran’s orders) to the West has come out and saying he has documentation proving Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. His aides are trying to arrange a public hearing to reveal the documents. [14] WorldThreats.com is eagerly awaiting this event should it occur, and also must mention that at this point, we do not believe the accusations against Chalabi personally (it is possible that some in the INC, possibly Chalabi’s security chief, are Iranian agents).

            June saw a new crisis develop in Iran despite having the past month or two relatively quiet. Iran has admitted to the IAEA that they illegally imported parts for advanced centrifuges. Despite the admission, the IAEA reported Iran’s covering-up of a nuclear program (note though that the IAEA has not concluded yet it is for nuclear weapons). The inspectors noted inconsistencies in Iranian explanations of signs of enrichment, that the Iranians lied claiming that the traces of enriched uranium were already on the purchased equipment, and that more traces of 36% enriched u-235 has been found. The investigators also noted that information on centrifuges was only submitted after long periods of pressure and even then, the information was contradictory. In response to the pressure, senior Iranian figures threatened to pull out of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. [15] The IAEA has also received information indicating that Iran may have yet another hidden nuclear site in Tehran. [16] Iran is so bold as to even continue the blocking of access to special military and “civilian” sites used in the uranium enrichment program. [17] Iran has even gone so far as to restart their Shihab-4 long-range missile program. [18]

            Luckily, according to Israeli military intelligence, Iran’s nuclear weapons quest has been delayed by about one year due to the rigorous inspections and Western eye over the program. Iran was forced to suspend plans to begin full-scale uranium enrichment in 2004, making Iran capable of producing a nuclear device by July 2004. Now, we have until summer 2005 to stop the program. [19] However, Iran has said they will likely begin building centrifuge parts again soon and continue the uranium enrichment process, so we may have even less time. [20]

            Terrorism in the Middle East continues to be encouraged by state sponsors. Iran has begun using its state-controlled media to incite Shiites in Bahrain, a major non-NATO ally of the US, to campaign against reforms. [21] A new effort inside Iran to recruit people for jihad in Iraq, Israel and Chechnya has brought in 2,000 people, some as young as 7 years old. [22] By mid-June, the number reportedly reached 10,000. [23] Iran is also using Hezbollah to destabilize Iraq. The Iraqi police have captured a Hezbollah officer who hurled a grenade injuring 5 Spanish troops. The officer confirmed that Hezbollah forces were being trained and equipped in Iran to destabilize Iraq. [24] Apparently, Iran’s mullahs know they must stop the tide of reforms and freedom in the region in order for their rule to survive.

            One of the first batches of these volunteers coming from Iran including 40 citizens from that country heavily armed. They were captured by Ukrainian forces after they reached Iraq, and were then turned over to British forces. [25] It is not a coincidence that soon after this, and the European condemnation of Iran’s non-cooperation with the IAEA, Iran detained British sailors (although they were released, Iran kept much of the equipment).

            At around the same time, Iran moved four divisions including the “golden division” of the regular army close to their southern border with Iraq. It was likely in response to the tensions of the month, and in preparation to invade Iraq should the US withdraw. [26]

            Meanwhile, in Syria, the crackdown on freedom is getting more extreme to counter the popularity of potential reformers and protestors. The Reform Party of Syria is now broadcasting into Syria in an attempt to undermine the Baathist regime. In response to emboldened Kurdish activists, Syria randomly arrested and sometimes tortured Kurds. Syria even went as far as to ban all 13 Kurdish parties. [27] In response, the Syrian Committee for Human Rights published a list of 580 political prisoners being held at the Saydanaya prison alone. [28] In regards to terrorism, the CIA believes that Syria has stopped the Damascus-based propaganda arms of Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, and PFLP-GC but is still allowing their operational arms to work. [29]

            Egypt’s WMD programs are finally being acted against. The Proliferation Security Initiative alliance member, Turkey, intercepted a ship with highly sophisticated missiles sent for Egypt from Ukraine. [30] This shows Egypt that despite being a major non-NATO ally of the US, its WMD programs will not be tolerated. The Egyptian government, especially as Mubarak falls ill, is likely to grow more and more anti-American as Islamic radicalism grows there. Radical Islam’s popularity is likely responsible for the move in early June by Egyptian authorities to raid book stores, and confiscate publications “not conforming to Islam” (according to the judgment of Sunni leaders who demanded, and received, the power to order the destruction of “un-Islamic” materials). [31]

 

Asia

            Some analysts cheered when Russia joined the Proliferation Security Initiative meant to intercept shipments of illegal goods, particularly WMD components going to and from rogue states. [32] WorldThreats.com believes Russia is trying to shield itself from Western pressure. Russia has long been a major, if not the most major, suppliers of WMD-related goods and conventional arms to rogue states. We’ve been down this road before. Russia almost certainly will never stop selling goods to our enemies, as it not only raises money for them, but also helps them create an international anti-American alliance. Russia has nothing to lose from joining the PSI alliance. In fact, Russia can even used the pooled intelligence used by the alliance to

            A) Ensure that they aren’t caught selling illegal goods to rogue states

            B) Help rogue states thwart the efforts to stop their acquirement of illegal goods.

            Even if Russia’s government is genuinely in favor of PSI, which we highly doubt, it is still extremely probable that corruption in Russia will allow the shipments from Russia to continue, possibly with the assistance of intelligence gained from joining the PSI.

 

            On the Korean Peninsula, the US has begun to formally offer aid to North Korea. WorldThreats.com believes that aid should only be offered when we can verify it is going to the people, not the military or government alone. It must also only be delivered when steps to nuclear disarmament begin. Each step can be rewarded with new incentives. But aid should be limited; it mustn’t allow the regime to live on longer than necessary.

            Hopefully, South Korea will soon begin taking responsibility for their own defense. The removal of 12,000 American troops from the country to go to Iraq may prompt this. If South Korea is forced to defend herself, maybe then they’ll take the North Korean threat a little more seriously. If not, then our obligations to South Korea are no longer valid.

            The Chinese-Taiwan tension briefly heated up with talks of new arms purchases by Taiwan, and usual tough talk by the Chinese. In the midst of this, a top defense official in Taiwan said he wouldn’t be surprised if China attacked in 2006, a critical point for Taiwan to decide its relationship with China and desire for independence. At that time, China will be willing and able to blockade the island using missile-strike zones. [33]

 

Africa

            Since the US departure from Liberia after the removal of Charles Taylor, little has been noticed about his reign. Investigators are finding that his rule was not only corrupt, but that he allowed (and possibly was complicit in) Al-Qaeda to launder funds through the illegal trading of precious diamonds in Liberia. Further investigation revealed that Liberia also harbored three Al-Qaeda suspects in the 1998 embassy bombings in the Liberian capital as late as June or July 2001. [34] There is no proof Charles Taylor knew of their presence.

            In Zimbabwe, Mugabe is in the final steps of making a completely socialist, authoritarian state (if there isn’t a civil war). His anti-white rhetoric is reaching an all-time high, as he had the government seize the rest of the farm land. The Land Reform Minister proudly proclaimed there would no longer be private land. Senior officials later on said that whites would be removed from the country, although there has been no formal expulsion. [35]

            As for Libya, an abundance of accusations are coming out that Muammar Gadhafi has not fully turned-around yet. Reports indicate that the IAEA doubts Libya’s claims that they didn’t review Chinese nuclear designs. Yet, inspectors found Chinese-written documents on how to design and manufacture nuclear warheads. Libya claims these documents were not used in the program. [36] In addition, there is good evidence that Libya attempted to sponsor and direct terrorist attacks as late as autumn 2003. Abdurrahman Alamoudi, an American-Muslim leader in jail for having connections to terrorists and taking Libyan funding (possibly for terrorism?) as well as a Libyan intelligence official in Saudi custody have confirmed the plot.

            They each gave their interrogators specific details about a plot to kill Crown Prince Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. Alamoudi says he met with Gadhafi in between June and August 2003. The intelligence agent confirms he was an operational commander for the plot in November 2003. The agent was arrested when he was caught trying to give $1 million to four Saudi terrorists to help them attack Abdullah’s motorcade with shoulder-fired missiles and grenade launchers. [37] The Saudi press also accused Libya of plotting to kill the Arab League Secretary-General Amr Mousa after he rejected Libyan plans for an Arab union. [38] Libya agreed to disarm its WMD programs and dramatically reform that in late November and December 2003. WorldThreats.com concludes this is from the seizure of evidence proving Libya had a nuclear program, and the capture of the intelligence agent leading the plot in Saudi Arabia. Gadhafi realized he could no longer hide behind a cloud of deniability, and had to change. But that doesn’t mean he won’t try to get away with what he can.

            Gadhafi’s son, apparently aware of the reports going around, denied that there was such a terrorist plot and soon after, his organization announced the release of 28 political prisoners. [39]



[1] Alameda Times-Star Online, June 4, 2004.

[2] UPI, June 7, 2004.

[3] Al-Quds al-Arabi, June 10, 2004.

[4] World Tribune, June 23, 2004.

[5] BBC, June 23, 2004.

[6] Geostrategy-Direct.com, week of June 29, 2004.

[7] Washington Post, June 10, 2004.

[8] Geostrategy-Direct.com, week of June 29, 2004.

[9] Associated Press, June 14, 2004.

[10] New York Times, June 7, 2004.

[11] Al-Zaman, June 9, 2004.

[12] World Tribune, June 11, 2004.

[13] New York Post, June 25, 2004.

[14] Al-Yawm al-Aakher, June 7, 2004.

[15] New York Times, June 1, 2004.

[16] Geostrategy-Direct.com, week of June 29, 2004.

[17] IRNA (Iran), June 2, 2004.

[18] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, June 14, 2004.

[19] Middle East Newsline, June 2, 2004.

[20] Washington Post, June 25, 2004.

[21] New York Post, June 1, 2004.

[22] Sharq (Iran), June 5, 2004.

[23] Middle East Newsline, June 16, 2004.

[24] Geostrategy-Direct.com, week of June 29, 2004.

[25] Al-Zaman, June 9, 2004.

[26] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, June 15, 2004.

[27] Reform Party of Syria, June 2, 2004.

[28] Akhbar al-Sharq, May 31, 2004.

[29] Middle East Newsline, June 25, 2004.

[30] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, June 4, 2004.

[31] Middle East Online, June 5, 2004.

[32] Associated Press, June 1, 2004.

[33] WorldNetDaily.com, June 10, 2004.

[34] Associated Press, June 1, 2004.

[35] Newsmax.com, June 8, 2004.

[36] Geostrategy-Direct.com, week of June 15, 2004.

[37] New York Times, June 9, 2004.

[38] Okaz (Saudi Arabia), June 14, 2004.

[39] Al-Raya, June 11, 2004.

Home | Contact Us | FAQ
W O R L D T H R E A T S . C O M
is Proudly Hosted by
Bill Greene